Steelers Xtreme Forum


 
HomeHarris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Home10RegisterLog inContact
Become a member of the Steelers Xtreme community to join in on the discussions and get access to members-only forums. Registering is free and easy.

 

 Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison

Go down 
5 posters
AuthorMessage
Galax Steeler

Galax Steeler


Posts : 11576
Join date : 2011-12-30
Location : Galax Va Nickname: Trixie

Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison EmptyTue Feb 12, 2013 2:58 am

By John Harris

Published: Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Updated 5 hours ago

Steelers linebacker James Harrison is willing to restructure his contract. Smart man.

Harrison won't take a pay cut, however, and that stubborn streak could make him an ex-Steeler.

Harrison is scheduled to earn $6.57 million in 2013 and $7.57 million in '14. That's a big salary-cap number for a pass-rusher who turns 35 in May, is coming off knee surgery a year ago and is two years removed from two back surgeries.

Harrison may be banged up, but it's shortsighted to label him old. He's better than most of the young linebackers on the roster, who can't beat him out. He's still good when he isn't playing every down, but the Steelers aren't paying him all that money to be a part-time player.

Which brings us back where we started. Are the Steelers better off with Harrison on their payroll, even in a more limited role, at a fraction of his salary? Yes, they are. To believe otherwise is delusional.

Who on the Steelers' roster is better than Harrison at right outside linebacker? Jason Worilds? He's 10 years younger than Harrison, but an even bigger injury risk. Chris Carter? No, not the Cris Carter who just made the Pro Football Hall of Fame as a wide receiver.

“I don't think anybody would argue at the end of the season that James Harrison was the best linebacker the Steelers had,” said agent Bill Parise, who represents Harrison.

Parise is paid handsomely to say nice things about his client. Harrison wasn't the Steelers best linebacker in 2012 — Lawrence Timmons was. But Harrison was productive. In 13 games, he recorded 70 tackles and six sacks.

What concerns the Steelers are the three games Harrison missed while recovering from knee surgery. When he returned, Harrison wasn't the same explosive force from four years ago, and the Steelers must decide whether to pay Harrison his full salary this year and next, restructure his contract to create a lower cap number, or release him.

So let's take emotion out of what the Steelers should do regarding Harrison. The front office has to make a cold-blooded business decision, just as it did with Pro Bowl standouts Alan Faneca and Joey Porter.

The Steelers should restructure Harrison's contract or ask him to take a pay cut. They can't afford to pay him $6.5 million next season, so find a number both sides can agree upon.

Working in Harrison's favor is the Steelers' glaring lack of depth. The Steelers replaced Porter with Harrison and Faneca with Chris Kemoeatu. Their roster isn't deep anymore.

Will keeping Harrison on the payroll make the Steelers a playoff team again? They were 8-8 with him in the lineup in 2012. Although Harrison was slowed by injuries, can the Steelers be absolutely certain he hasn't played his best football?

Harrison is worth the gamble. The Steelers need Harrison because they aren't better without him. Letting him go would be a mistake.

Football being a business, I have the perfect landing spot for Harrison if things don't work out with the Steelers: Cleveland.

New Browns owner Jimmy Haslam, a former Steelers' minority owner, would consider it a major coup to sign Harrison, who was raised in nearby Akron. You better believe Haslam wouldn't ask Harrison to take a pay cut.

“There's no list (of prospective teams),” Parise said. “We're not talking about it. We've certainly not even gone down that road. James loves Pittsburgh. I think the reason people are talking about James is because he's a higher salary guy.”

At the same time, Parise said the Steelers made no assurances they won't release Harrison.

New York Giants running back Ahmad Bradshaw was released last week, a year after scoring the winning touchdown in Super Bowl XLVI. Bradshaw led the Giants in rushing each of the last three years, but he struggled with foot and ankle injuries and was scheduled to earn $4.25 million in 2013.

“Could it happen? It certainly could. The NFL can cut any player at any time,” Parise said. “Having said that, if James Harrison was released, there would be 31 NFL teams interested in him.

“Can we help the Steelers by restructuring James' contract? We're certainly willing to do that. Do we need to take less money? I don't think so. Personally, I think he's a bargain.”

Personally, I think the Steelers could draft a linebacker in the first round to replace Harrison, but their future is now. It's cheaper to keep him.

Read more: http://triblive.com/sports/johnharris/3462343-74/harrison-steelers-dejankovacevic#ixzz2Kg3rVIwk
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook

_________________
Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison DeCastro
Back to top Go down
stlrtruck

stlrtruck


Posts : 11707
Join date : 2011-04-03
Location : Dunedin, FL

Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Re: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison EmptyTue Feb 12, 2013 6:55 am

This article goes to show how bad our 'depth' really is in key positions.

_________________
Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Scaled.php?server=695&filename=trucky
60 MIN
53 MEN
1 NATION
STEELERS NATION Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison 3056903510

I am the MAN that created the MYTH that started the LEGEND

Don't choose good when greatness is available!
Back to top Go down
Galax Steeler

Galax Steeler


Posts : 11576
Join date : 2011-12-30
Location : Galax Va Nickname: Trixie

Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Re: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison EmptyWed Feb 13, 2013 3:37 am

stlrtruck wrote:
This article goes to show how bad our 'depth' really is in key positions.

Yea and the sad part is it is more then one position they we are really needing help in.

_________________
Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison DeCastro
Back to top Go down
effyou515

effyou515


Posts : 5116
Join date : 2011-09-28
Location : from upper Ohio Valley to Conyers Ga.

Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Re: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison EmptyWed Feb 13, 2013 4:55 am

I would keep him another year to see if he can stay healthy. if not then let him go next year. anyways the Steelers are in a corner on this one they gave him the contract.

_________________
When the truth gets buried deep
Beneath the thousand years asleep
Time demands a turnaround
And once again the truth is found
Back to top Go down
solardave

solardave


Posts : 6246
Join date : 2011-09-30
Location : State of Confusion

Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Re: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison EmptyWed Feb 13, 2013 3:12 pm

We pretty much have to keep him for this year but he's got to be realistic. If he means what he says and he loves the Burgh he'll have to help out by restructuring to lesson the cap hit. It is true we're thin all over and that's not something we as fans are not used to.
Back to top Go down
fer69

fer69


Posts : 2190
Join date : 2011-09-17
Location : home dah!!!

Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Re: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison EmptyThu Feb 14, 2013 3:42 pm

I'd cut him I know he's a fun favorite but it's time to let Worilds play

_________________
Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Fer6910

F@(k Wallace.. Throw it to Miller
Back to top Go down
stlrtruck

stlrtruck


Posts : 11707
Join date : 2011-04-03
Location : Dunedin, FL

Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Re: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison EmptyThu Feb 14, 2013 5:07 pm

fer69 wrote:
I'd cut him I know he's a fun favorite but it's time to let Worilds play

You can't just cut him, you've got to consider the cap hit for him leaving vs. him staying.

_________________
Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Scaled.php?server=695&filename=trucky
60 MIN
53 MEN
1 NATION
STEELERS NATION Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison 3056903510

I am the MAN that created the MYTH that started the LEGEND

Don't choose good when greatness is available!
Back to top Go down
Galax Steeler

Galax Steeler


Posts : 11576
Join date : 2011-12-30
Location : Galax Va Nickname: Trixie

Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Re: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison EmptyFri Feb 15, 2013 2:30 am

fer69 wrote:
I'd cut him I know he's a fun favorite but it's time to let Worilds play

I would love to see Worilds get his chance this year and you will probably get to see him alot more then last year.

_________________
Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison DeCastro
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty
PostSubject: Re: Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison   Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Harris: Cheaper to keep Steelers’ Harrison
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Harris set for whatever happens with Steelers
» Harris: Is old age catching up to the Steelers?
» Harris: 20 questions for Steelers
» Harris: Steelers lucky to keep Khan
» Harris: WVU’s Bailey a good fit for Steelers

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Steelers Xtreme Forum :: Football & Other Sports :: Steelers Talk-
Jump to: