Subject: Which receivers group are you taking? Sat Oct 24, 2020 12:22 pm
Andre Hastings Charles Johnson Yancey Thigpen Ernie Mills Kordell Stewart
Hines Ward Santonio Holmes Nate Washington Cedrick Wilson Willie Reid
Hines Ward Antwaan Randle El Mike Wallace Antonio Brown Emmanuel Sanders
JuJu Smith-Schuster Chase Claypool Diontae Johnson James Washington Ray-Ray McCloud
_________________
If you're going to be a smart ass, you'd better be smart. Otherwise, you're just an ass.
Last edited by Wallace108 on Sun Oct 25, 2020 12:40 am; edited 1 time in total
effyou515
Posts : 5154 Join date : 2011-09-28 Location : from upper Ohio Valley to Conyers Ga.
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Sat Oct 24, 2020 12:45 pm
the group playing this season the deepest l've ever seen play for the Steelers. their fast but all take route running serious.
LambertWardSteel
Posts : 1643 Join date : 2015-05-14 Location : Myerstown PA
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:26 pm
Wallace108 wrote:
Andre Hastings Chad Johnson Yancey Thigpen Ernie Mills Kordell Stewart
Hines Ward Santonio Holmes Nate Washington Cedrick Wilson Willie Reid
Hines Ward Antwaan Randle El Mike Wallace Antonio Brown Emmanuel Sanders
JuJu Smith-Schuster Chase Claypool Diontae Johnson James Washington Ray-Ray McCloud
It's funny you made this post. I have been watching a lot of old games on YouTube lately and have had this question running thru my head. I watched Steelers late 70s but was too young to really follow it in depth. But I was seeing YouTube games where Swann and Stallworth were out and they'd put Jim Smith and Theo Bell in and they'd have big games.
Right now my pick would be the second to last group. But, you look at the talent at the current WR group and feel like it maybe does, or definitely could, surpass any on this list. I am really interested to see what this current group looks like after gaining some familiarity with Ben, and if Johnson can stay healthy and create an additional problem for opposing defenses. McCloud gives a nice #5 guy...we've not had that for a while.
I seem to remember during when the first group on your list was active, I'm thinking it was Dan Rooney who said that he considered it to be their best group ever. That, of course was before any of the lists that followed. It's a good problem to have...trying to decide who is best over a 30 year period when there is a strong case for each group. The Steelers draft and develop WRs better than any team
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Sat Oct 24, 2020 3:58 pm
The AB group is a little deceptive because he and Sanders hadn't reached their prime yet, and Ward was past his. If we could have all 3 of them in their prime, that would be the obvious choice for best group, but since that wasn't the case when they were together, I have to go with another group. For me, I have to go with Yancey's group. Individually, none of them were great. But collectively, they were electric. When Kordell was still Slash, that was a fun offense to watch. I think we forget how good that offense was because it wasn't together very long.
_________________
If you're going to be a smart ass, you'd better be smart. Otherwise, you're just an ass.
Master_Of_Puppets
Posts : 2928 Join date : 2011-04-08
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Sat Oct 24, 2020 9:00 pm
perhaps you could assign a letter or number to each group for easier identification...
i go with group 1 or group A ... and kordell will stay a receiver and never play QB...group A were all young no names . i dont think any of them did much after leaving the steelers.
chad johnson played for the bengals....charles johnson played for the steelers..
Wallace108 likes this post
LambertWardSteel
Posts : 1643 Join date : 2015-05-14 Location : Myerstown PA
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Sun Oct 25, 2020 12:02 am
Wallace108 wrote:
The AB group is a little deceptive because he and Sanders hadn't reached their prime yet, and Ward was past his. If we could have all 3 of them in their prime, that would be the obvious choice for best group, but since that wasn't the case when they were together, I have to go with another group. For me, I have to go with Yancey's group. Individually, none of them were great. But collectively, they were electric. When Kordell was still Slash, that was a fun offense to watch. I think we forget how good that offense was because it wasn't together very long.
You are right on that. It's easy to look at that group as it ended up as opposed to where they were at when they were together. When the AB group came up for contracts I remember hoping they got Wallace resigned because he seemed most skilled. In the end they failed on Wallace and signed AB. For a long time I was so happy the Wallace signing failed and they got AB...despite some really good years we know how that ended. I just saw Sanders playing not long ago and couldn't help but think it's too bad they didn't sign him back then...hindsight is 20-20.
I might go with the first group then while hoping the current group matures to upper levels.
I loved Stewart when he was first playing in Pittsburgh. I really believe had he stayed in a 'slash' role for 10-12 years he may have been a HOF player. He basically created a new position. What an incredible weapon that could be with someone with those skills lining up at WR-RB-maybe 5-10 snaps a game at QB. I remember a game with Cincy and we were getting beat up. Kordell caught like a 70 yard TD to start the tide going the other way. Also those plays where he faked a hand off and then ran 80 yards. You could even have him in there at RB or QB and let him do a surprise punt here and there. I think the last NFL game he played he was the emergency punter and won special team honors that week. Even though he is probably 50 now we might not be worse off signing him to replace Colquitt
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Sun Oct 25, 2020 12:45 am
Master_Of_Puppets wrote:
chad johnson played for the bengals....charles johnson played for the steelers..
Charles Johnson. Or as I liked to call him ... Ocho Uno.
_________________
If you're going to be a smart ass, you'd better be smart. Otherwise, you're just an ass.
solardave
Posts : 6336 Join date : 2011-09-30 Location : State of Confusion
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:09 am
I think the current group has by far the highest ceiling but group B was one of my favorites to watch.
jak341
Posts : 3609 Join date : 2015-04-09 Location : Pittsburgh
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:39 am
Group "B" brought home the bacon, but group "C" had more talent. I'll take any group with Hines as the #1 receiver.
I still remember when Hines was drafted. My first thought was "who?"
solardave likes this post
IowaSteeler927
Posts : 5179 Join date : 2015-04-11 Location : Des Moines, Iowa
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:33 am
LambertWardSteel wrote:
Hines Ward Santonio Holmes Nate Washington Cedrick Wilson Willie Reid
As of right now this would be my choice. Need to see more from our current group before they unseat the likes of Ward and Holmes in their primes. Nate Washington was pretty decent as well. I'd say right now we have a talented group but they're all still young and still raw.
Enticing to put the Young Money Crew on here but let's be honest here, those guys were talented but hadn't yet realized their potential and Wallace and Sanders were out of town before they had time to mesh because Wallace was selfish and wanted elite receiver money when he wasn't an elite receiver talent and Sanders ended up in Denver. Wish we could of kept Sanders/Brown together at that time but it wasn't feasible, and Sanders was injury prone anyways.
_________________
"Success isn't owned, it's leased and the rent is due every day." - TJ Watt
Master_Of_Puppets
Posts : 2928 Join date : 2011-04-08
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:35 am
IowaSteeler927 wrote:
LambertWardSteel wrote:
Hines Ward Santonio Holmes Nate Washington Cedrick Wilson Willie Reid
As of right now this would be my choice. Need to see more from our current group before they unseat the likes of Ward and Holmes in their primes. Nate Washington was pretty decent as well. I'd say right now we have a talented group but they're all still young and still raw.
Enticing to put the Young Money Crew on here but let's be honest here, those guys were talented but hadn't yet realized their potential and Wallace and Sanders were out of town before they had time to mesh because Wallace was selfish and wanted elite receiver money when he wasn't an elite receiver talent and Sanders ended up in Denver. Wish we could of kept Sanders/Brown together at that time but it wasn't feasible, and Sanders was injury prone anyways.
willie reid had one catch in his illustrious career.... ...tomlin sent him packin.
IowaSteeler927
Posts : 5179 Join date : 2015-04-11 Location : Des Moines, Iowa
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:07 am
Master_Of_Puppets wrote:
IowaSteeler927 wrote:
LambertWardSteel wrote:
Hines Ward Santonio Holmes Nate Washington Cedrick Wilson Willie Reid
As of right now this would be my choice. Need to see more from our current group before they unseat the likes of Ward and Holmes in their primes. Nate Washington was pretty decent as well. I'd say right now we have a talented group but they're all still young and still raw.
Enticing to put the Young Money Crew on here but let's be honest here, those guys were talented but hadn't yet realized their potential and Wallace and Sanders were out of town before they had time to mesh because Wallace was selfish and wanted elite receiver money when he wasn't an elite receiver talent and Sanders ended up in Denver. Wish we could of kept Sanders/Brown together at that time but it wasn't feasible, and Sanders was injury prone anyways.
willie reid had one catch in his illustrious career.... ...tomlin sent him packin.
Haha yep, the Top 3 guys on that list though were pretty damn solid.
_________________
"Success isn't owned, it's leased and the rent is due every day." - TJ Watt
effyou515
Posts : 5154 Join date : 2011-09-28 Location : from upper Ohio Valley to Conyers Ga.
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:41 am
Master_Of_Puppets wrote:
IowaSteeler927 wrote:
LambertWardSteel wrote:
Hines Ward Santonio Holmes Nate Washington Cedrick Wilson Willie Reid
As of right now this would be my choice. Need to see more from our current group before they unseat the likes of Ward and Holmes in their primes. Nate Washington was pretty decent as well. I'd say right now we have a talented group but they're all still young and still raw.
Enticing to put the Young Money Crew on here but let's be honest here, those guys were talented but hadn't yet realized their potential and Wallace and Sanders were out of town before they had time to mesh because Wallace was selfish and wanted elite receiver money when he wasn't an elite receiver talent and Sanders ended up in Denver. Wish we could of kept Sanders/Brown together at that time but it wasn't feasible, and Sanders was injury prone anyways.
willie reid had one catch in his illustrious career.... ...tomlin sent him packin.
didn't Cedrick Wilson get cut for beating his girlfriend? then Holmes went mental after his big superbowl catch. imho Ward the only good one out of the bunch.
IowaSteeler927
Posts : 5179 Join date : 2015-04-11 Location : Des Moines, Iowa
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:54 am
effyou515 wrote:
Master_Of_Puppets wrote:
IowaSteeler927 wrote:
LambertWardSteel wrote:
Hines Ward Santonio Holmes Nate Washington Cedrick Wilson Willie Reid
As of right now this would be my choice. Need to see more from our current group before they unseat the likes of Ward and Holmes in their primes. Nate Washington was pretty decent as well. I'd say right now we have a talented group but they're all still young and still raw.
Enticing to put the Young Money Crew on here but let's be honest here, those guys were talented but hadn't yet realized their potential and Wallace and Sanders were out of town before they had time to mesh because Wallace was selfish and wanted elite receiver money when he wasn't an elite receiver talent and Sanders ended up in Denver. Wish we could of kept Sanders/Brown together at that time but it wasn't feasible, and Sanders was injury prone anyways.
willie reid had one catch in his illustrious career.... ...tomlin sent him packin.
didn't Cedrick Wilson get cut for beating his girlfriend? then Holmes went mental after his big superbowl catch. imho Ward the only good one out of the bunch.
In this case I'm only speaking towards talent and accomplishments as Steelers at the given times those particular receiver groups played together. Not taking into account off-the-field antics.
_________________
"Success isn't owned, it's leased and the rent is due every day." - TJ Watt
effyou515
Posts : 5154 Join date : 2011-09-28 Location : from upper Ohio Valley to Conyers Ga.
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:31 am
IowaSteeler927 wrote:
effyou515 wrote:
Master_Of_Puppets wrote:
IowaSteeler927 wrote:
LambertWardSteel wrote:
Hines Ward Santonio Holmes Nate Washington Cedrick Wilson Willie Reid
As of right now this would be my choice. Need to see more from our current group before they unseat the likes of Ward and Holmes in their primes. Nate Washington was pretty decent as well. I'd say right now we have a talented group but they're all still young and still raw.
Enticing to put the Young Money Crew on here but let's be honest here, those guys were talented but hadn't yet realized their potential and Wallace and Sanders were out of town before they had time to mesh because Wallace was selfish and wanted elite receiver money when he wasn't an elite receiver talent and Sanders ended up in Denver. Wish we could of kept Sanders/Brown together at that time but it wasn't feasible, and Sanders was injury prone anyways.
willie reid had one catch in his illustrious career.... ...tomlin sent him packin.
didn't Cedrick Wilson get cut for beating his girlfriend? then Holmes went mental after his big superbowl catch. imho Ward the only good one out of the bunch.
In this case I'm only speaking towards talent and accomplishments as Steelers at the given times those particular receiver groups played together. Not taking into account off-the-field antics.
fine and dandy but they hurt the team in the long run, the 2 in my post throw a monkey wrench in the front office long term plan by having to using draft picks sooner then planned. messing up their drafting best player available to help the team in other area of need.
Master_Of_Puppets
Posts : 2928 Join date : 2011-04-08
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking? Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:34 pm
these list are tough because of all the things you have to factor in such as who was the QB, and what was the offensive philosophy during their tenure. obviously receivers playing with neil odonell and on a heavy running team are not going stand out as much as guys playing with Ben throwing the ball 500+ times a year. not to mention the rule changes that give receivers an advantage.
Sponsored content
Subject: Re: Which receivers group are you taking?